While many saw the Hanging Gardens of Babylon as a legend, research shows that it may have actually existed, just not where originally thought.
Imagine yourself traveling through a scorching-hot desert in the Middle East. Like a shimmering mirage rising from the sandy floor, you suddenly see lush vegetation cascading over columns and terraces as high as 75 feet. Beautiful plants, herbs, and other greenery wind around stone monoliths. You can smell the aromas of exotic flowers hitting your nostrils as you approach the area downwind of the magnificent oasis.
You reach the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, supposedly built in the sixth century B.C. by King Nebuchadnezzar II.
As the story goes, the king’s wife, Amytis, desperately missed her homeland of Media in the northwestern part of modern-day Iran. As a gift to his homesick love, the king apparently built an elaborate garden to give his wife a beautiful memory of home.
To do this, the king constructed a series of waterways to serve as an irrigation system. Water from a nearby river was raised high above the gardens to cascade downward in a stunning fashion.
The History Of The Hanging Gardens Of Babylon
Many Ancient Greek historians wrote down what they believed the gardens looked like before they were supposedly destroyed. Berossus of Chaldea, a priest who lived in the late fourth century B.C., gave the oldest-known written account of the hanging gardens.
Diodorus Siculus, drawing on the source material from Berossus, wrote:
“The approach was sloped like a hillside and the several parts of the structure rose from one another tier on tier. On all this, the earth had been piled … and was thickly planted with trees of every kind that, by their great size and other charm, gave pleasure to the beholder. The water machines [raised] the water in great abundance from the river, although no one outside could see it.”
These vivid descriptions relied solely on secondhand information passed down from generations after the gardens were demolished. Although Alexander the Great’s army went to Babylon and reported seeing gardens, his soldiers were prone to exaggeration. As of now, there’s no known way to confirm their reports.
The technology behind the irrigation system is also quite puzzling. A huge screw, similar to the one created by Archimedes, would not see widespread use until four centuries later. So how would the king be able to plan such a complex system in the first place, let alone carry it out?
Were The Hanging Gardens Of Babylon Real?
Unanswered questions certainly didn’t stop people from searching for the remains of the gardens. For centuries, archeologists combed the area where ancient Babylon used to be for relics and remnants. In fact, one group of German archeologists spent a whopping 20 years there at the turn of the 20th century, hoping to finally unearth the long-lost wonder. But they were out of luck — they didn’t find a single clue.
A lack of physical evidence, coupled with no existing firsthand accounts, led many scholars to wonder whether the fabled Hanging Gardens of Babylon ever even existed. Some experts even began to suspect the story was a “historical mirage.” But what if everyone was just searching for the gardens in the wrong place?
Research published in 2013 revealed a possible answer. Dr. Stephanie Dalley of Oxford University announced her theory that ancient historians simply got their locations and kings mixed up.
Where Were The Hanging Gardens Of Babylon Located?
Dalley, one of the world’s foremost experts on Mesopotamian civilizations, uncovered updated translations of several ancient texts. Based on her research, she believes that King Sennacherib, not Nebuchadnezzar II, was actually the one who built the hanging gardens.
She also thinks the gardens were located in the ancient city of Nineveh, near the current-day city of Mosul, Iraq. On top of that, she believes the gardens were constructed in the seventh century B.C., nearly a hundred years earlier than scholars had originally thought.
If Dalley’s theory is correct, that means the hanging gardens were constructed in Assyria, which is about 300 miles north of where ancient Babylon used to be.
A Possible Location Of The Hanging Gardens of Babylon
Interestingly enough, excavations near Mosul do back up Dalley’s claims. Archaeologists uncovered evidence of a huge bronze screw that could have moved water from the Euphrates River into the gardens. They also discovered an inscription that said the screw delivered water to the city.
Bas-relief carvings near the site depict lush gardens supplied by an aqueduct. The hilly terrain surrounding Mosul was much more likely to receive water from an aqueduct versus the flatlands of Babylon.
Dalley further explained that the Assyrians conquered Babylon in 689 B.C. That was before the time of the construction of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon. Therefore, Ancient Greek historians may have had their locations wrong all along.
Ironically enough, King Sennacherib himself may have added to the confusion, because he often called Nineveh by the name of New Babylonia.
Centuries later, most “garden” excavations focused on the ancient city of Babylon and not Nineveh. Those miscalculations may have been what led archaeologists to doubt the existence of the ancient wonder of the world in the first place.
As scientists dig deeper into Nineveh, they may find more evidence of these vast gardens in the future. Even more promising? The excavation site near Mosul sits on a terraced hill, just as Greek historians once described in their accounts.
What Did The Hanging Gardens Of Babylon Look Like?
As to what the hanging gardens really looked like, no firsthand accounts currently exist. And all the secondhand accounts only describe what the gardens used to look like before they were ultimately destroyed.
So until archaeologists find an ancient text describing the gardens accurately, consider visiting your local botanical garden or greenhouse to walk among lush landscapes and carefully pruned shrubs. Then close your eyes and imagine traveling 2,500 years into the past to the time of ancient kings and conquerors.